Monday, December 30, 2013

My Review of Black List's Review

My Review of Black List's Review.

A while back, I submitted my sitcom script "Tested" to the Black List, and only recently (December 16th) orders an evaluation. I don't care too much for paid reviews, though I've never actually had one. Today (or tonight, since it's 3:42 am here) I received my evaluation, which I will show below. Please check out my script for reverence.

Everything in Courier is the Black list.

SCRIPT EVALUATIONS

Era:
NYC
Locations:
Modern Times
Genre:
Dark Comedy
Logline:
In an attempt to warn a past lover he may have given her herpes, womanizer Ryan accidentally breaks up and must subsequently rekindle her engagement.
Bible Logline:
After finding out he has herpes, an artist and his sister seek out his past lovers to warn them of their potential risk.
Strengths:
This script truly shines in its dialog. The sharp wit reflected in banter between the entertaining characters - most notably Ryan and Emily - helps push the plot forward and ameliorate the premise with the audience. There are moments of comedic brilliance akin to the early years of HOW I MET YOUR MOTHER - with Ryan floating in to save the horny damsel in distress, or Chelsea launching herself at the car after discovering she might have herpes. These are fantastic and entertaining visuals further improved by brilliant descriptions that run throughout the script, carrying the same tongue in cheek tone so well established in the story.
Weaknesses:
However, the plot itself is too straightforward. There aren't sufficient complications to the script - everything happens very linearly and generally without much character-based or external confrontation. Without that, there isn't much growth for Ryan to go through, as there's little that makes him vulnerable. This is actually a major problem with the script in general - it takes far too long to make Ryan sympathetic - something that should happen much earlier in the script doesn't actually happen until the third act. At that point, he should have already demonstrated his merit to win the heart of the audience but he's spent the entire time acting only out of self-interest. The opening can also be eliminated - it does little to have it repeated and Ryan's discovery of his infection is a much more effective opening. Finally, the character of Summer is non-existent in the script but discussed as a main character in the Bible - by adding her to the script, not only will it add significant complications to the pilot, but it will also help establish her character as an important one.
Prospects:
The show could be very successful, but needs to focus much more on its characters in order to do so. Ryan needs to be significantly more sympathetic to the audience, and Emily needs to be much more present to solidify her character in the audience's mind. With stronger characters, viewers would be more inclined to return to the show about a morally depraved man trying to make amends.
Pages:
25
General Thoughts on Bible:
The bible is concise with not only good discussion of the characters, but a lengthy discussion of sample episodes. The only thing missing that could benefit the Bible would be a discussion of the endgame for Ryan's character development, to help establish a sense of overall direction with the show.


As stated before, I've never ordered an evaluation, and all I can say is I could not be more satisfied. Exact, concise, and straight to the point, this has opened my eyes to the strengths and weaknesses. The rating given to the script at 7 out of 10, which is a fair rating in my opinion and I think matches up pretty well with the review; praise but with notes. Funny enough, I've gotten the "How I met your mother" bit before. I don't normally watch that show, though I am not above thinking it's a good show. Point is, for $50 (yes, 50), the review is reasonably affordable and comparable to many other evaluations services that are a little more on the steep end. As well as that, the evaluation has an option of being seen publically, so that $50 could be the handy bit of exposure you needed (granted the rating is complimentary).
My review of the review; 10/10. Informative, eye-opening, and extremely confirming. If you're not sold on the whole Black List thing, this should be a strong recomendation, if for nothing else than its evaluation service.

Friday, December 20, 2013

WRITER LIFE HACKS: REDDIT

WRITER LIFE HACKS: REDDIT

Can anyone truly talk about Reddit positively without something unironically late to the party. Besides having a subreddit (i.e. dedicate forum) for practically everything, Reddit has some pretty good subreddits for writing.

r/Screenwriting : An forum dedicated to screenwriting news, queries, and advice. A unique combination of sourced news and personal discussions, this is something of a Swiss army knife, though would require for determined searching to find gems.
Active Subscribers (at time of publication): Over 19,000.

r/Writing : Something of a more general subreddit, though still containing screenwriting topics, it is a subreddit for the general activity and pursuit of writing, though at times it seems more skewed towards books and movies than anything else. Similar to the screenwriting subreddit, it features a mix of news, discussions, and general promotion.
Active Subscribers (ATP) : Over 100,000.

r/ReadMyScript : My personal favorite and definitely a must for those seeking encouragement, advice, and feedback on your scripts. In this subreddit, you can post a script you've written and wish to get feedback on. Most commonly, these are done by uploading the files to Google Drive, and setting the privacy to allow anyone with the link. Typically, my rule of thumb is that for every upload you do, you must read someone else's script and give feedback, especially positive or constructive.
Actove Subscribers (ATP): Over 2,000.

Reddit indeed has alot to offer. And I'm sure we haven't even scratched the surface of how it can help you.

Monday, November 25, 2013

BRIAN GRIFFIN DEAD: GENIUS OR DICKERY

BRIAN GRIFFIN DEAD: GENIUS OR DICKERY

The news has already probably broken where ever you are; Brian Griffin, the anthromorphic, alcholic, aspiring novelist dog from the Family Guy show has been killed off, and replaced with Vinny, a tough, no B.S. taking canine.

While fans are calling for blood, I'll list briefly why, from a writing point of view, this is either genius or dickery (i.e. an act of completely dick-headed-ness).

Genius:

Fitting tone, style, and humor; Family Guy was been known for its random and absurd actions, namely random flashbacks, gruesome chicken/man fights, period jokes (both historical and ovulation), and deaths (Diana Simmers, Murt Goldmine's wife, Joe Swanson's son (sort of), and KIND OF Cleaveland Brown in a way). Even Peter died and came back to life (TWICE!).

In fact, Brian's death has been hinted at for many years; he's 35-50 in dog years, I can count at least two occasions where his own dog mortality has been the butt of a dark  joke, and even he's hit and killed a dog mirroring his own future death.

Why would you truly think, in a show as random and bizzare as Family Guy, that ANYONE would be safe.

Plus, in a world of long running TV shows, where "killing off character" is usually code for a side character leaving, it's kind of refreshing that one show went for the gusto.

Even the introduction of a replacement seemed like a stab at the idea.

Dickery:

This changes the entire dynamic of the show. It's short-sighted simply to quote Brian as being simply Stewie's equal when he was also Peter's best friend, a (not so) secret admirer of Lois, a comforter to Meg, and even Quagmire's pet-peeve (pun not intended). Admittedly, Brian had slipped away from the voice of reason character he was in the beginning, but he was still something of a father figure to Peter.

It is of course ironic that the most human character should be an animal in a world where they are easily disposed of and tossed aside. It's almost cruel and slightly sadistic that a semi-pro-animal rights show would just cull a dog. Their reasoning, according to reports, is that killing off a human, especially in the family, would have too much of an impact and been too close to home. Though the backlash on twitter, with the hash tag #bringbrianback, says otherwise.

But...

I can't be the only one who's skeptical of this. I can't be the only one who thinks there's a bigger joke to all this. It wasn't so long ago the infamous "You're getting old" episode had us think they were closing down shop when really it was a big joke about hype and normality. I think one of a few things may happen;

  1. Brian is brought back; According to report the staff writers loved "an idea" and planned several next episodes around it. Notice the report never said "THE idea" or even specifying it directly as being the idea of Brian's death. I think the idea may be of simply killing off a character, bringing in a new one, making them unlikable as possible, and then killing them off and returning everything to normal.
  2. Some possible solutions to Brian's death may be;
    • Vinny slowly morphs into Brian, to no one's notice.
    • God brings Brian back to life.
    • Brian isn't dead.
    • Stewie finds a way to bringing Brian back (maybe with a Brian ray gun or something)
    • Death himself brings Brian back.
    • Or (possibly most likely in my opinion) They just act as if nothing happen, Brian back in place.
Worth a thought. Only the 8th of December, Family Guy's next air time, will tell.

Monday, November 11, 2013

BRIEF NOTE PART 2

BRIEF NOTE PART 2


I forget to mention I have two more sitcom pilots under consideration for Amazon Studios.

TITLE: TRACY

BRIEF: An eager, ambition, and outspoken young woman has one advantage over most women when it comes to living in a man’s world… she’s was a man. Tracy takes on a world of double standards and patriarchy with her sense of feminism, outspoken views, and awe inspiring humanity.

GENRE: Sitcom, LGBT, female protagonist, feminism.

IT'S LIKE: "Ugly Betty" meets "Queer as folk".



TITLE: TESTED

BRIEF: What happens when your one night stands become your to-do list?
When Ryan finds out he has herpes, he has to contact every partner he’s had in the last year… all 582 of them! With the help of his persistent sister, Ryan owes these women more than just an apology.

GENRE: Sitcom, dating, episodic.

IT'S LIKE: "My name is Earl" meets "Sex and the city".


Please check them out. The links are the pictures themselves.

Sunday, November 10, 2013

DRIFTERS REVIEW: HONEST SHOW, DEVOID OF STEREOTYPE.

DRIFTERS REVIEW:

HONEST SHOW, DEVOID OF STEREOTYPE.


On behalf of all men, I'd like to thank Jessica Knappett, Drifter's writer and star, for finally proving that the whole "women get mad at you for cheating on them in their dreams" thing is actually true, as written and performed by a supporter female role.

"Drifters", E4's newest sitcom, could be taken as something of an Inbetweeners buffer show, but than you'd be taking it all wrong. Nearly entirely autobiographical, Drifters is about a trio of friends (the typical protagonist, fiesty side kick, and dopey friend) who are in that horrible state of post-uni, pre-reality; hence the name. The great thing about the show is it hasn't taken itself too serious in the first few episodes, which it could have, given that the show glances at severe youth unemployment, internship culture, and sexism. Indeed the show actually depicts one character giving her boyfriend a blow while he plays video games. Side note; this works equally well with films.

Definitely not a show that was enough attention in terms press or "coming soon" advertisements, especially compared to the equally new "London Irish", or even the already stable "Fresh Meat".

An honest show that doesn't feel the need to overly appeal to men, though it does so successfully (at least to me). Not so much a Female Inbetweeners as it is a British "Girls" with Jessica about to become a UK response to Lena Dunham.

Rating: 8/10. No one will be blamed if the show got a little more preachy on youth unemployment.

Available on 4OD, Drifters airs Thursday at 9:30 pm, on E4.

HOW TO KEEP GOING.

HOW TO KEEP GOING.

About exactly 45 days ago I submitted Ace Off to Amazon Studios as part of their open policy submission process mention in a previous blog. The reply from Amazon Studios was;

"Thank you again for creating your project, ACE OFF, at Amazon Studios. The option and evaluation period is now over, and we have chosen not to exercise or extend our option on your project."

Under no circumstance do I say this should put people off submitting to the program. Because this is simply one reply to this particular projects (which through my own admission is an acquired taste), while there are three other projects waiting for a response (Eric & Seymor, Tracy, and Tested). Eric and Seymor's option deadline is the 14th of November (this coming Thursday), so finger crossed.

I'm writing this practically fresh from the little nip in my stomach at ANOTHER rejection. Ten years straight is the case when it comes to this journey of mine. And yet the pain was quick an in a flash. Which got me thinking about how and why a writer continues on with his work, and deals with rejection, frustration, and apathy to the craft and art of his/her writing and his search for opportunities. So here's a brief list of tips and tricks for aspiring writers on how to keep going, and things that may help.

1. It's happened to the best.
    • An interesting movement that has happened of late has been a de-glorification and pro-humanization of successful people. Writers are not exempt from this. Many modern writers are victim to the same cruel rejection letters as their aspiring comrades. 
      • Emily Dickinson was practically unsuccessful during her life; a female Van Gogh of sorts.
      • Dr. Seuss received 27 rejection letters for his first book (not counting others before his name was recognized).
      • Stephen King's first novel Carrie, now in cinemas a second time as an adapted movie, received 30 rejections. Amazingly, his wife is the sole reason he's respected writer now, as she convinced him to resubmit one last time, as he was just about to throw Carrie in the trash.
      • J.k. Rowling is probably the most famous and most extreme example, as she was practically penniless, borderline homeless, divorced, and a single mother on welfare. There's a disgusting rumor that she wrote an idea for the Harry Potter book on a nappy (diaper for American readers). Whether true or not, J.K. is still the perfect example of what it means to be a writer with nothing to loose.
      • "The Rum Diaries" was written by Hunter S. Thompson at 16... it was not published until he was 61... I feel like a little whiny bitch, don't you?
2. Small victories.
    • It helps to critically and honestly list any and all achievements you have done so far, no matter how small they are. Being critical is as much praising yourself as it is criticizing yourself.
    • For example. I'm 24 now. Since I was 14 (which was when I decided I wanted to be a writer), I've;
      • Written poems and short stories for a few magazines and newspapers.
      • Written some very well received Teen Titans fan fiction.
      • Won the "Jim Craven" 2007 award for poetry.
      • Written a few short films for college.
      • Been published as part of an anthology in "No Bother" in March of this year.
      • Receiving praise and education in writing from Setev Downes, Stephen Walsh, Ferdia Mac Anna, Donal Beecher, and Brenda Woods.
      • Self Published on Amazon.
3. Keep at it.
    • The proof is in the pudding, so to speak. Very few successful writings don't have thick skins or blow off criticism. Think of this as your writer boot camp. If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball. If you can write under rejection, worries, and shit, you can write.
    • It's not a no, it's a not yet.
      • Breaking Bad was pitched to HBO, Showtime, TNT, and FX; all rejected it. AMC were the only group that picked it up.
      • When you think about it, it's a numbers game. If someone tells you the exact number of years, months, or day it would take you to become a author or writer, you would look forward to that day. When you think about it, the only difference between reality and that hypothetical situation is knowledge of that date. Murphy's Law applies greatly to someone who constantly writes and submits. Whatever can happen, will happen, eventually. If you love something, truly love it, it shouldn't matter if it takes 10, 20, or 80 years, you would do it until you make it.
4. Strategies.
    • You may not have gotten rejected because of something you did, but take this time and chance to reflect, re-draft, re-write, or maybe even polish your delivery.
    • Many cult heroes are those who build their own fan base  which takes over years, and are great for calling to action. Many Youtubers  internet celebrities, comedians, and film makers now make a decent living appealing to their niches. Chances are, you keep at it, gaining friends and fans alike, you be able to self-publish to them directly.
    • When I was in my teens, I made an ultimatum; either I become published at 23 or I just put everything online. The irony is I did both, unknowingly.
      • My point is, Online and Self-publishing are no real and cheap alternatives to getting rejections. Publishers aren't driven solely by quality anymore. As Gandhi once (did not) say "Be the change you want to see in the world". Perhaps you need to do that. If you truly do believe in an idea, maybe you should put your name on the line then.
        • Check out KDP for a free ebook publishing service on Amazon.
    • Study and research publishers more thoroughly.
      • I personally find it insulting when publishers say "check out our catalog to note the books we cover", which I've always found as a ploy to either discourage persuadable writers from submitting, or as a cheeky way to get you to buy their products. But their might actually be something to this.
        • Some publishers have imprints and subsidiaries hidden in the website, usually at the bottom or in contact. Instead of submitting to regular publishers, their more genre specific outlets may possibly be the ticket.
      • On average, many publishers work in units of months and years. So far example; A book may be submitted in January, replied to in March or April, accepted by July, finalized by October (proof read, focus group reviewed, re-edited, etc), and finally be released either in time for Christmas sales or January New Year Sales.
        • With this in mind, maybe try to time submissions in time for events. So maybe submit romance novels in the summer or spring, so it'll have time to possibly be published for Valentine's Day. If you're story is event specific, try to think in terms of that.
I hope this helps. If nothing else, perhaps I'll be back he Friday with some good new on Eric and Seymor.

Saturday, October 26, 2013

WRITER LIFE HACKS: THE FUTURE OF STORYTELLING

WRITER LIFE HACKS: THE FUTURE OF STORYTELLING

"The Future of Storytelling" is a FREE mooc (Massive Open Online Course) open to anyone and everyone to take part on an 8 week online, hosted by the Fachhochschule Potsdam University of Applied Sciences, and available through Iversity. With over 50,000 enrolled students (including myself), this truly is a once in a life time experiment in how online content and communication can be used for university standard education. And what better way to start your journey, than to take part in the course, The Future of Storytelling, which, over the 8 week period, starting the 25th of October until the 20th of December (No, it's not too late to enroll and start), will cover structure, story definition, plot, character, scenes, history, literary movements & techniques, and even the future of storytelling, with examples of e-publishing, online content, and transmedia.

In short, whether you're an advocate for the arts or simply have a few minutes a week for one of the 8 weekly updates, this is a highly recommended online FREE (don't forget that) course on the amazing work done, being done, and will be done for writers everywhere, whether in film, novels, television, new media, games, or whatever may come next.

The Twitter official hashtag is #storymooc and this is the facebook page.

Monday, September 30, 2013

BRIEF NOTE

In my previous blog I mentioned Amazon Studios and mentioned that I have some projects currently open to public rating on it. I won't waste your time. If you are interested in reviewing two television series pitches, feel free to check out the projects. Just click on the images.

ACE OFF - SITCOM
PILOT SCRIPT PDF


ERIC & SEYMOR - CARTOON SERIES
MINI-BIBLE PDF


Don't forget to check out the hundreds of other projects available to review.

WRITER LIFE HACKS: AMAZON STUDIOS

WRITER LIFE HACKS: AMAZON STUDIOS

For "Dear Dirty America" I wrote a short blog about the change in writing brought upon by the internet and the new masters of the digital age, namely the content providers who are slowly becoming the content producers, in the case of Netflix, Youtube, and Amazon providing exclusively original material. I personally already have a few self published titles on the Amazon Kindle store.

Well, Amazon must be either breaking new ground or trying to expand into Netflix territory because Amazon Studios, Amazon's movie and television series production studio, has an open policy on accepting all many of pitches.



Currently they are accepting proposals for feature length films, comedy series, and children series. Both feature films and comedy series require PDFs of fully fleshed out scripts while children series only require a mini-bible of the series, characters, etc. Once your pitch has been uploaded, Amazon has up to 45 days to make a decision on whether they wish to develop the idea, extend the consideration deadline, or reject the idea. Both developing the idea and extending the consideration period result in the writer being paid up to $10,000 for their pitch, and can result in the creator being paid an extra $55,000 (for series) / $200,000 (for feature) if the project is picked up for full production.



Besides the chance to potentially be seen and get your foot in the door of a new and exciting world of online cinematic entertainment, you can also set your pitch to public if you wish (which is optional and not mandatory). This creates something of a secondary "social" aspect to the website, allowing you not only to give advice and feedback on other public projects (and vice versa), but also allows you the chance to get involved in other's projects as a collaborator. Along with this, Amazon posts open opportunities for writers to offer their services for re-writes on accepted material.


What more can I say? Check it out! And while you're there, don't forget to check out my pitch, ACE OFF, I've published on the site for details and suggestions on how to apply.

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

LONDON IRISH REVIEW: GOOD SHOW, BAD AUDIENCE.

LONDON IRISH REVIEW:
GOOD SHOW, BAD AUDIENCE.

London Irish has been pedelled for the last few weeks as a unique as a new young/20-something comedy; one of many Channel 4 has now produced with the edition of Fresh Meat and The Inbetweeners. Written by Lisa McGee of "Being Human" fame, it introduces the otherwise British majority audience to a quartet of (London)Derry Northern Irishmen (and women), Lisa's native community.

The show was ALWAYS going to be an acquired taste, for many reasons, whether it be because an otherwise successful but dramatic writer moving into the comedy spectrum, the slightly other-worldly combination of Irish and British cultures forming the Northern Irish heroes, or the fast talking ascents. Personally, I enjoyed it... but then again I'm morbid, foul mouthed, and London Irish is something I would jump at the chance to co-write on. That being said, a recent habit I've develop as of late while watching shows is to hop onto twitter as soon as a break comes my way. Undoubtedly,  Lisa has definitely struck a nerve with folks, as 70% and up of the tweets were repetitive tweets about it being "shit", "shite", or "stereotypical".

I have no problem with people and there opinions, and, like I said, there was nowhere everyone would like this. But it's extraordinary that people couldn't do some simple research to find that the show was written by an actual Irish person. I'm not saying that excuses perceptions of stereotype, but I am saying not everything is PC; sometimes the reason there's a stereotype about the Irish might be because we may have had something to do with starting it. We're not a nation of drinkers...but...to quote the show... "we drink until we're sober".

The show is very fast paced, very brutally honest, and quite surreal. Definitely not for people who are slow. I'm not saying 70% of the people complaining are too dumb for the show... just possibly mentally defunct. Along with that, the show has a sincere modesty about it. It's like every minute Lisa is saying "this is what's happening... I'm not sugar coating it". It's on a Tuesday at 10pm on Channel 4.... of course there are going to be unholy swears and references to a man's amputated hand.

What is the future of the show? We may very well be seeing something of a new Spaced or Monthy Python; something only a niche of people will appreciate.

My ONLY gripe with the show is the insecurity I feel about having two dim witted characters. Though it did work for Friends, so why not.

Rating: 7/10. Too early to call, but going to be interesting none the less.

"London Irish" is available of 4OD and broadcasted on Channel 4 every Tuesday at 10pm, and again an hour later on Channel 4 +1.

Monday, September 23, 2013

PITCHING TO PRODUCERS

PITCHING TO PRODUCERS.

A TRUE STORY.

I have a feeling this may be the beginning of my life. Like the event I went to on Wednesday the 11th of September, 2013, may actually be a stepping stone, if not a funny anecdote I will tell in a number of years. Before I begin I wish to clarify I will not reveal names or locations, both for privacy sake but also so this may appeal to as many people as possible and not be viewed as a thing that can only happen in BLANK country or with BLANK production company.

DETAILS.

Firstly, the event invitation was simple enough to get, especially since it seems to be the first of it's kind. A production company and writer had organised a writer/producer speed networking event, where everyone gets 5 minutes with each other to exchange ideas, details, and opinions. Funny enough, I only heard about it through a different Facebook page group I was already with, which focused more on independent film crew work. When I say simple, I mean simply emailing saying Of course, I'm sure different events would have different protocols, but this seemed general more relaxed than low budget; more an experiment into the practicalities of future events than a spur of the moment sort of thing.

I prepared for the event in a space of just over a week, by focusing on a few key points;

  • Pitches
  • Business Cards
  • Attire

Pitches:
Short and simple. It's always advised that pitches be as short as possible, but with a time limited of five minutes, this advice was to be particularly heeded to. I made a list of;

  • Every idea I had.
  • The formats I considered them for.
  • The genre they best fitted in.
  • A one sentence brief description of the premise
  • And a comparison.
For example:
  • Hell Spawn
  • Half Hour Television
  • Sitcom
  • X is a careless bachelor, until his world is turned upside-down by the responsibilities of raising a demon baby left at his door step.
  • It's "The Life and Times of Tim" meets "Little Nicky".
FYI! I LITERALLY just pulled that out of my ass.

I learnt all this for 20 different projects. Go big or go home! This was serious. I knew I needed to get them hooked and interested as quickly and as soon as possible. One thing that helped was Twitter. If you can get your idea down to 140 characters, you know you're being concise.

Business Cards:
I've been in far too many positions and situations in my life to know that this event absolutely needed a business card. This wasn't the kind of thing where you would be forgiven for not having a business card on you because you didn't expect to meet a producer in a bar. This was an event SPECIFICALLY for you to say "HEY! RIGHT HERE FELLAS! I'M OVER HERE!".

The biggest part of getting a business card was deciding the style you wanted on it. It wasn't just a case of having a piece of card with your name and number. You need something that says you. So from very early on, I knew I would have to design my own card. The following is the design;

At first, the ruled page looked seemed cliche and trivial, but along with the "drawn on" font text, you came across as charmingly childish, like a glossy sort of immature. On one side was the obvious contact details, while on the other was something original; a micro-pitch. The micro-pitch, as you can see, consisted of blank space on the back where I would write one of the pitches I had practiced, so effectively you would be giving each producer two pitches instead of one.

Attire/Clothing;
This was the most difficult and frustrating decision to make, even to the last minute. What do you wear to one of these? On one hand it was a business networking event, yet simultaneously this was the film industry... and you're a writer... and this event was in a bar... it's hardly a studio exec office. Solution? Smart casual. Something simple like a plain black shirt with rolled up sleeves, plain light blue jeans, and sneakers would give the desired appeal of someone professional, yet relaxed. I would however advice you to consider where it is you are going, since my decision was based on the fact the location was a bar, in the city, and the attendees were expected to be 20-40 somethings in the film industry.

THE EVENT.

The event was to take place at 7 pm. I arrived by 6:55 pm. Ideally, I would have been there earlier, but due to transportation and distance the bus ride took approx 1 hour and 20 minutes, while walking to the location took close to 30 minutes. The bar was within the city center, yet still far enough for it to be secluded and intimate enough. Once there, I walked up the stairs to the private room where the event was being held. I was especially early, which I could tell since literally no one was around to even tell me if I had the right place. None the less, I was the fourth person to arrive. But after a quick chat with the writers, the room was filled. Despite the invitation sawing to be there at 7pm, and that the event would start at 7:15pm, it actually started at 7:30pm. It was clearly a relaxed occasion and I felt slightly over-dressed and over-prepared.

We were then explained the way the speed networking would go about. Writers would remain seated, while the producers would rotate around the room every five minutes. Simple. So, with that, it begun.

From my experience, I would say you need a few things to pull something like this off;

  • A sense of Humor & Perspective.
  • Directness & Concision.
Sense of Humor & Perspective;
The event was very relaxed, smart casual, slightly bohemian, in a nice Dublin establishment, with similar minded people of various degrees, backgrounds, and ages. RELAX. It may sound fancy and glamorous (and perhaps to it is), but ultimately it is what it is; it's a group of human beings connecting with each other. Days before I was wracking my nerves, trying to get the unique combination of professional but not a "square". I wanted my business cards to be tactful, yet.... "hip". I suppose I made the right call, since everyone were impressed with the business cards, but used words like "oh, that's cool" or "oh that's mad". Yes, you're here to be professional, and so are other people, but be playful about it. Enjoy yourself.

For example. The very first person I talked to, turned out to be a writer. There weren't enough producers to go around, so they had to use one or two writers to fill in the gaps. I just laughed and had a nice conversation with someone like minded. The next person was a producer, and despite talking business, I did manage to slip in the odd note of a intrigue; I had a quick chat about feminism, time-travel, Desperate Housewives, and many others. Part of networking is about actually making a connection, and I'm quite happy to say I laughed as much as I smiled.

As well as that, bare in mind EVERYONE is in a similar situation you are in, or else they wouldn't be there. Every writer is there because they're like you. Every producer is there because they want to meet writers like you. There's nothing to be scared or worry about. Granted, don't go in with your pants down, obviously, but trust me, it would take a lot to put these people off you. The Film and TV industry in Ireland is miles different than the rest of Europe and the Western World. Whether better or worst is besides the point. The point is a smaller industry calls for less formalities and more modesty.

Directness & Concision.
With modesty and perspective in mind, there's no shame in simply being direct and steering the conversation for your own ends. With every producer, after a polite hand shake, I simply asked;

"What are you looking for?"

I wouldn't have kept this up the whole night if it didn't work the first time. A simple direct question such as those five words divulged a lot; everything from production company history, previous projects, and even intended future projects. Remember the preparation earlier I mentioned? This is what it was for. With just one or two keywords like "drama" or "co-production", I was able to whittle down my prospects and pitch the closest idea that fit that producer. This resulted not only in the remaining time left answering questions the producers had, but it also served as rehearsal and practice for the next producer in line, as well as serving as a mental note of who was who (i.e. Producer #5 was Idea #9). This also helped portray myself as a professional, and perhaps place a little pressure on the producers as well (if I had this idea down to a 't', who's the say another producer won't steal it). After any number of nervous pitches, imagine how refreshing and memorable a professional pitch may be.

AFTER WORD.

It is a marathon. A mental free for all. Everyone was exhausted. Granted, there was a short break, but still, everyone was pooped. A quick cigarette was recommended and welcomed, even if it was self-prescribed. All in all, it was amazingly worthwhile and was greatly appreciated by everyone in attendance. It's almost a rite of passage; tossed into the lion's den and expected to claw your way back out, it's a test of your endurance and commitment. It's what separates people who can write from people who are writers; the people who have an idea and the people who make ideas.

It instilled something that I had thought I lost before; a sense that there are people just like me who also want to do something, despite the current economic situation. That's probably the greatest reason to go to one of these networking events; for the sake of keeping yourself sane while being yourself.

FILMS & TV

FILMS & TV

A GLANCE AT POPULARITY AND REACTION


In the last number of months, and possibly years, I've noticed myself becoming more and more drawn towards television productions as a writer. The list of shows I've grown to love because of their unique delivery, intelligent plots, and witty dialogue is LITERALLY too long to write in a productive blog, however chances are you name it, I have an opinion on it. Indeed my tastes, though risking sounding boastful, are grounded in talent flocking the small screen. Writers, directors, producers, cinematographers, and actors alike have all made the committed transition to television in the wake of The Wire, The Sopranos, and Breaking Bad. There's many appeals as of late for the new wave of talent to scurry over to television.
  • More reliable work.
  • More defined schedules.
    • A season of 6-12 one hour episodes may take just as little or even less than any feature film, resulting in more bang for the buck.
  • Instant nationwide fame for the actor (for what may take an exclusively film actor years to gain).
  • "Fan-base" following
  • Weekly episodes guarantees maximum exposure.
  • More accessibly "on-demand" than recently released films.
  • More defined royalties for television performances than film/DVD sales.
  • Compatible prices.
    • Game of Thrones and The Walking Dead reportedly have a budget of $1 Million per episode, resulting in a season of 6-12 episodes costing less than most major label film.
      • Again, more bang for the buck.
  • Length for writers and directors to truly explore character, plot, themes, issues, and conflicts.
  • Apart from Water Shed regulations and a polite disclaimer at the start, there are no censors on television.
  Yet, I'm often annoyed by the slightly stale reverence people hold for the current model of films (I will cover future models soon). Being a writer in Ireland is tough enough as it is without having to deal with the fact that there is next to nothing in the way of funding, commissions, or even transparency in television broadcasting, forcing many to head for the UK (which isn't a bad thing). One glance at film and television message and job boards will reveal a deep seeded incline for films.

But why isn't that? Granted; studios' claims of loses in cinema are exaggerated and trivial, but the accessibility and quality of modern day film has declined due to a number of reasons;
  • Sales:
    • As stated, sales have taken a hit, though not necessarily as tough as you may possibly be led to believe, and not entirely because of pirate bay (trust me Michael Bay, VERY few people are seeding Transformers on Utorrent right now). This hit has led to many studios to shuffle a little and some have taken the approach of bigger is better, hence the outrageously over-ambitious films that are simply money thrown at a screen. I get slightly amused when producers are shocked a $80 Million movie couldn't break even, especially if its a third or fourth installment in a franchise.
    • The other side of this sword, however, is that for the movie to be worth making, they need more return on their investment,which in turns causes theaters to raise ticket prices.
  • Art:
    • The reaction to these super block buster films is, of course, the indie. The true indie. The film even Kick Starter couldn't help. The $5,000, shot on a few DSLR, film that has the boom operator looking like Bobby Sands towards the end because they can't afford to pay him but "can offer a credit and show reel material". In essence there's nothing wrong with this film apart from the fact it's in a medium where it'll never be seen outside of film festivals. This is because of simply two things;
      • Lack of marketable material.
      • Censors.
    • The other part of what's wrong with this is that you have films that are good pieces of art, but aren't films, despite trying to be passed off as them. They are visually and audibly pleasing and provocative, but not films. A one long clip of a sun rise is art... but it's not a film. This has definitely arisen from short film culture, as well as foreign cinephile subcultures such as the French. Outside of that, it'll never communicate well with the average person. And on one hand you can argue it's above them, but on the other, it doesn't say much for you as a film maker if your film has requirements and suggested reading in order to be enjoyed. Make in the same way critics of Avatar who didn't see the film in 3D are unjustly dismissed since they saw it outside its "intended" environment, so too can you not say the similar. Film is not circumstantial.
With the avaunt of Netflix and Amazon in the works of slowly building their catalog of original programming, television programs may very well not need to deal the foibles of network or even cable broadcasters, including government funded ones (hint, hint). We have already seen this happen with House of Cards and Orange is the New Black. One could argue Youtube has already done the same with a whole sleuth of comedians, musicians, actors, film makers, and cats who are cute.

So why? Why is there still something to movies that makes people want to be part of them. Is it the nostalgia? Films were first, and were more of a travelling side show attraction than the format they are today. And with respect to television, the high quality feature is relatively recent. And it actually is ironic that Mad Men, New Girl, and Homeland should have to share air time with Toddlers and Tiaras, Big Brother, and whatever MTV is shoveling out these days. Indeed TV is just as guilty as cinema when it comes to hits and misses. And perhaps on a grander scheme. How many hundreds of channels produce thousands of shows?How many are good? And sadly not even the good ones are guaranteed not to be cancelled.

I am entirely in favor of remodeling cinema and keeping it alive. Perhaps I'm wrong to question why would others care for this thing when they can do something bigger, longer, and more engrossing, like TV. Maybe film will be, in the future, something like an espresso shot of escapism. And maybe that's it. Maybe that's why film is still looked up to; because it's escapism. TV has never been that. TV has been informative and reactionary. It's comforting and intriguing, but not escapism. We watch Breaking Bad with friends, and our dinner, and while we're knitting. Film, is the big event. That one treat we give to ourselves, similar to how our parents gave it to us. We escape the house, the job, the neighbors,  and we sit in the dark... and escape everything. Not because it's unbearable, but because we want to bare someone else's cross for a while.

There's no doubt in my mind I still have a strange attraction towards writing for television, and I'm going through a slightly distaste for cinephile culture (especially in Ireland), but, just like Joss Wheldon moves from Vampires to Avangers, I'm not ruling anything out. And neither should you.

Monday, September 2, 2013

WRITER LIFE HACKS: BBC WRITER'S ROOM

WRITER LIFE HACK: BBC WRITER'S ROOM


I really cannot recommend the BBC's Writer's Room enough; it truly is a one stop noticeboard for aspiring writers across the world. The BBC has always prided itself on attracting the best but this section of the BBC website truly out does itself with it's resources.
  • SEND YOUR SCRIPT
    • The BBC accepts scripts. Formerly, it had an open policy towards scripts, but it has now opted for a more scheduled and structured period setting, where it will announce it's acceptance seasons. A new policy, it is unclear if there are to be multiple annual seasons, or just one. Please check regularly.
  • WRITE YOUR SCRIPT
    • Are you LITERALLY just starting to write? Or do you just like reading about the art/craft? The writer's room has a section on how to get started and how to keep at it. Everything from structure to redrafting. Something of a cheat sheet for writing.
  • BE INSPIRED
    • Interviews with established writers... what more could you want.
  • OPPORTUNITIES
    • The BBC takes it upon itself to keep you informed about the chances you have to get your work published, produced, read, or commissioned by third parties. Even if you are too late to send your script to the BBC, you can always get it accepted by someone else.
  • BBC SCRIPT LIBRARY
The BBC Writer's Room is not just a website for writing. It is a website to keep you writing until you get that faithful knock at the door.

THE RISE OF DRAMEDY

THE RISE OF "DRAMEDY".

Even as I write the word, Blogger's auto correct underlines it in red, as if to politely say "I believe you've made a mistake", while unintentionally dating itself straight away.

For those of you unfamiliar, in recent years "Dramedy", a combination of features of drama and comedy, have risen in popularity, mostly in the form of television shows and "indie" films. Most notable example of "Dramedies" include "Ugly Betty", "Desperate Housewives", "Girls", "Weeds", "Little Miss Sunshine", "New Girl", "Glee", and "Juno", as well as arguably "Scrubs", "Misfits", and "Skins".

Common features and formats included (but are definitely not limited to);
  • Between half hour and hour long 3-4 act structures.
  • Usually Prime Time/Early Post Watershed hours.
  • Featuring "Young" protagonists (young being anyway from late teens to mid-30's).
  • Set in mundane or "poetic realistic" settings (for example, living in New York in the magical time of your 20s, or the world stopping troubles of high school, etc).
  • Light-hearted approaches to formerly taboo or serious subjects (e.g. premarital sex, drugs, relationships, etc).
But why has Dramedy risen to pop culture awareness from seemingly nowhere? Here are a few reasons;
  • Mainstream Media;
    • In an attempt to please as many people as possible, TV has blurred the lines between drama and comedy, offering both in one easy to swallow show.
  • Changing Tastes;
    • With familiar formats being worn worst for wear, TV writers have become inventive to stay ahead of an audience that found laugh-track sitcoms and telenovella styled dramas redundant. How many times have you guessed what was going to happen next, only to be proven correct?
    • "Drama" seems to now apply to darker, more plot driven stories such as "House of Cards", "Lost", and "Utopia". The term drama now attracts a much more "adult" and sophisticated audience, possibly even appealing to disenchanted cinephiles.
    • "Indie" once meant a film that no one would ever see. Now it's just another film brought to you by one of the top five studios. With the rise in popularity of Indies came a taste for quirky, unique, odd-ball characters in heavy situations.
  • Changing Media and trends;
    • Comedy sketches are now left for Youtube, while cinematic experiences are enjoyed in the home. To compete, comedies had to become ongoing stories with plot rather than simply episodic.
  • Popular precursors to Dramedies;
    • "Friends".
    • "Sex and the city".
    • "Meet the parents".
    • "Firefly".
    • "Buffy the vampire slayer".
    • "The Simpsons".
    • "Different Strokes"
But now that it's here, or at least acknowledged as existing, where do we go? Is it a fad or the next step in structuralism? One school of thought is that, much in the same way "Alien" was a combination of horror and sci-fi elements, Dramedy may simply be the natural progression for televised stories. Another way of looking at it though is shows like Different Strokes and the Brady Bunch were dramedies by contemporary standards long before the shows we now watch today, which implies these things go in cycles. I doubt New Girl will go down the same route Different Strokes did with a child molesting bike shop owner.

Whatever your thought may be, Dramedies may very well be here for the meanwhile. So lets get used to it. Or not? Leave a comment about how you feel.