Monday, September 30, 2013

BRIEF NOTE

In my previous blog I mentioned Amazon Studios and mentioned that I have some projects currently open to public rating on it. I won't waste your time. If you are interested in reviewing two television series pitches, feel free to check out the projects. Just click on the images.

ACE OFF - SITCOM
PILOT SCRIPT PDF


ERIC & SEYMOR - CARTOON SERIES
MINI-BIBLE PDF


Don't forget to check out the hundreds of other projects available to review.

WRITER LIFE HACKS: AMAZON STUDIOS

WRITER LIFE HACKS: AMAZON STUDIOS

For "Dear Dirty America" I wrote a short blog about the change in writing brought upon by the internet and the new masters of the digital age, namely the content providers who are slowly becoming the content producers, in the case of Netflix, Youtube, and Amazon providing exclusively original material. I personally already have a few self published titles on the Amazon Kindle store.

Well, Amazon must be either breaking new ground or trying to expand into Netflix territory because Amazon Studios, Amazon's movie and television series production studio, has an open policy on accepting all many of pitches.



Currently they are accepting proposals for feature length films, comedy series, and children series. Both feature films and comedy series require PDFs of fully fleshed out scripts while children series only require a mini-bible of the series, characters, etc. Once your pitch has been uploaded, Amazon has up to 45 days to make a decision on whether they wish to develop the idea, extend the consideration deadline, or reject the idea. Both developing the idea and extending the consideration period result in the writer being paid up to $10,000 for their pitch, and can result in the creator being paid an extra $55,000 (for series) / $200,000 (for feature) if the project is picked up for full production.



Besides the chance to potentially be seen and get your foot in the door of a new and exciting world of online cinematic entertainment, you can also set your pitch to public if you wish (which is optional and not mandatory). This creates something of a secondary "social" aspect to the website, allowing you not only to give advice and feedback on other public projects (and vice versa), but also allows you the chance to get involved in other's projects as a collaborator. Along with this, Amazon posts open opportunities for writers to offer their services for re-writes on accepted material.


What more can I say? Check it out! And while you're there, don't forget to check out my pitch, ACE OFF, I've published on the site for details and suggestions on how to apply.

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

LONDON IRISH REVIEW: GOOD SHOW, BAD AUDIENCE.

LONDON IRISH REVIEW:
GOOD SHOW, BAD AUDIENCE.

London Irish has been pedelled for the last few weeks as a unique as a new young/20-something comedy; one of many Channel 4 has now produced with the edition of Fresh Meat and The Inbetweeners. Written by Lisa McGee of "Being Human" fame, it introduces the otherwise British majority audience to a quartet of (London)Derry Northern Irishmen (and women), Lisa's native community.

The show was ALWAYS going to be an acquired taste, for many reasons, whether it be because an otherwise successful but dramatic writer moving into the comedy spectrum, the slightly other-worldly combination of Irish and British cultures forming the Northern Irish heroes, or the fast talking ascents. Personally, I enjoyed it... but then again I'm morbid, foul mouthed, and London Irish is something I would jump at the chance to co-write on. That being said, a recent habit I've develop as of late while watching shows is to hop onto twitter as soon as a break comes my way. Undoubtedly,  Lisa has definitely struck a nerve with folks, as 70% and up of the tweets were repetitive tweets about it being "shit", "shite", or "stereotypical".

I have no problem with people and there opinions, and, like I said, there was nowhere everyone would like this. But it's extraordinary that people couldn't do some simple research to find that the show was written by an actual Irish person. I'm not saying that excuses perceptions of stereotype, but I am saying not everything is PC; sometimes the reason there's a stereotype about the Irish might be because we may have had something to do with starting it. We're not a nation of drinkers...but...to quote the show... "we drink until we're sober".

The show is very fast paced, very brutally honest, and quite surreal. Definitely not for people who are slow. I'm not saying 70% of the people complaining are too dumb for the show... just possibly mentally defunct. Along with that, the show has a sincere modesty about it. It's like every minute Lisa is saying "this is what's happening... I'm not sugar coating it". It's on a Tuesday at 10pm on Channel 4.... of course there are going to be unholy swears and references to a man's amputated hand.

What is the future of the show? We may very well be seeing something of a new Spaced or Monthy Python; something only a niche of people will appreciate.

My ONLY gripe with the show is the insecurity I feel about having two dim witted characters. Though it did work for Friends, so why not.

Rating: 7/10. Too early to call, but going to be interesting none the less.

"London Irish" is available of 4OD and broadcasted on Channel 4 every Tuesday at 10pm, and again an hour later on Channel 4 +1.

Monday, September 23, 2013

PITCHING TO PRODUCERS

PITCHING TO PRODUCERS.

A TRUE STORY.

I have a feeling this may be the beginning of my life. Like the event I went to on Wednesday the 11th of September, 2013, may actually be a stepping stone, if not a funny anecdote I will tell in a number of years. Before I begin I wish to clarify I will not reveal names or locations, both for privacy sake but also so this may appeal to as many people as possible and not be viewed as a thing that can only happen in BLANK country or with BLANK production company.

DETAILS.

Firstly, the event invitation was simple enough to get, especially since it seems to be the first of it's kind. A production company and writer had organised a writer/producer speed networking event, where everyone gets 5 minutes with each other to exchange ideas, details, and opinions. Funny enough, I only heard about it through a different Facebook page group I was already with, which focused more on independent film crew work. When I say simple, I mean simply emailing saying Of course, I'm sure different events would have different protocols, but this seemed general more relaxed than low budget; more an experiment into the practicalities of future events than a spur of the moment sort of thing.

I prepared for the event in a space of just over a week, by focusing on a few key points;

  • Pitches
  • Business Cards
  • Attire

Pitches:
Short and simple. It's always advised that pitches be as short as possible, but with a time limited of five minutes, this advice was to be particularly heeded to. I made a list of;

  • Every idea I had.
  • The formats I considered them for.
  • The genre they best fitted in.
  • A one sentence brief description of the premise
  • And a comparison.
For example:
  • Hell Spawn
  • Half Hour Television
  • Sitcom
  • X is a careless bachelor, until his world is turned upside-down by the responsibilities of raising a demon baby left at his door step.
  • It's "The Life and Times of Tim" meets "Little Nicky".
FYI! I LITERALLY just pulled that out of my ass.

I learnt all this for 20 different projects. Go big or go home! This was serious. I knew I needed to get them hooked and interested as quickly and as soon as possible. One thing that helped was Twitter. If you can get your idea down to 140 characters, you know you're being concise.

Business Cards:
I've been in far too many positions and situations in my life to know that this event absolutely needed a business card. This wasn't the kind of thing where you would be forgiven for not having a business card on you because you didn't expect to meet a producer in a bar. This was an event SPECIFICALLY for you to say "HEY! RIGHT HERE FELLAS! I'M OVER HERE!".

The biggest part of getting a business card was deciding the style you wanted on it. It wasn't just a case of having a piece of card with your name and number. You need something that says you. So from very early on, I knew I would have to design my own card. The following is the design;

At first, the ruled page looked seemed cliche and trivial, but along with the "drawn on" font text, you came across as charmingly childish, like a glossy sort of immature. On one side was the obvious contact details, while on the other was something original; a micro-pitch. The micro-pitch, as you can see, consisted of blank space on the back where I would write one of the pitches I had practiced, so effectively you would be giving each producer two pitches instead of one.

Attire/Clothing;
This was the most difficult and frustrating decision to make, even to the last minute. What do you wear to one of these? On one hand it was a business networking event, yet simultaneously this was the film industry... and you're a writer... and this event was in a bar... it's hardly a studio exec office. Solution? Smart casual. Something simple like a plain black shirt with rolled up sleeves, plain light blue jeans, and sneakers would give the desired appeal of someone professional, yet relaxed. I would however advice you to consider where it is you are going, since my decision was based on the fact the location was a bar, in the city, and the attendees were expected to be 20-40 somethings in the film industry.

THE EVENT.

The event was to take place at 7 pm. I arrived by 6:55 pm. Ideally, I would have been there earlier, but due to transportation and distance the bus ride took approx 1 hour and 20 minutes, while walking to the location took close to 30 minutes. The bar was within the city center, yet still far enough for it to be secluded and intimate enough. Once there, I walked up the stairs to the private room where the event was being held. I was especially early, which I could tell since literally no one was around to even tell me if I had the right place. None the less, I was the fourth person to arrive. But after a quick chat with the writers, the room was filled. Despite the invitation sawing to be there at 7pm, and that the event would start at 7:15pm, it actually started at 7:30pm. It was clearly a relaxed occasion and I felt slightly over-dressed and over-prepared.

We were then explained the way the speed networking would go about. Writers would remain seated, while the producers would rotate around the room every five minutes. Simple. So, with that, it begun.

From my experience, I would say you need a few things to pull something like this off;

  • A sense of Humor & Perspective.
  • Directness & Concision.
Sense of Humor & Perspective;
The event was very relaxed, smart casual, slightly bohemian, in a nice Dublin establishment, with similar minded people of various degrees, backgrounds, and ages. RELAX. It may sound fancy and glamorous (and perhaps to it is), but ultimately it is what it is; it's a group of human beings connecting with each other. Days before I was wracking my nerves, trying to get the unique combination of professional but not a "square". I wanted my business cards to be tactful, yet.... "hip". I suppose I made the right call, since everyone were impressed with the business cards, but used words like "oh, that's cool" or "oh that's mad". Yes, you're here to be professional, and so are other people, but be playful about it. Enjoy yourself.

For example. The very first person I talked to, turned out to be a writer. There weren't enough producers to go around, so they had to use one or two writers to fill in the gaps. I just laughed and had a nice conversation with someone like minded. The next person was a producer, and despite talking business, I did manage to slip in the odd note of a intrigue; I had a quick chat about feminism, time-travel, Desperate Housewives, and many others. Part of networking is about actually making a connection, and I'm quite happy to say I laughed as much as I smiled.

As well as that, bare in mind EVERYONE is in a similar situation you are in, or else they wouldn't be there. Every writer is there because they're like you. Every producer is there because they want to meet writers like you. There's nothing to be scared or worry about. Granted, don't go in with your pants down, obviously, but trust me, it would take a lot to put these people off you. The Film and TV industry in Ireland is miles different than the rest of Europe and the Western World. Whether better or worst is besides the point. The point is a smaller industry calls for less formalities and more modesty.

Directness & Concision.
With modesty and perspective in mind, there's no shame in simply being direct and steering the conversation for your own ends. With every producer, after a polite hand shake, I simply asked;

"What are you looking for?"

I wouldn't have kept this up the whole night if it didn't work the first time. A simple direct question such as those five words divulged a lot; everything from production company history, previous projects, and even intended future projects. Remember the preparation earlier I mentioned? This is what it was for. With just one or two keywords like "drama" or "co-production", I was able to whittle down my prospects and pitch the closest idea that fit that producer. This resulted not only in the remaining time left answering questions the producers had, but it also served as rehearsal and practice for the next producer in line, as well as serving as a mental note of who was who (i.e. Producer #5 was Idea #9). This also helped portray myself as a professional, and perhaps place a little pressure on the producers as well (if I had this idea down to a 't', who's the say another producer won't steal it). After any number of nervous pitches, imagine how refreshing and memorable a professional pitch may be.

AFTER WORD.

It is a marathon. A mental free for all. Everyone was exhausted. Granted, there was a short break, but still, everyone was pooped. A quick cigarette was recommended and welcomed, even if it was self-prescribed. All in all, it was amazingly worthwhile and was greatly appreciated by everyone in attendance. It's almost a rite of passage; tossed into the lion's den and expected to claw your way back out, it's a test of your endurance and commitment. It's what separates people who can write from people who are writers; the people who have an idea and the people who make ideas.

It instilled something that I had thought I lost before; a sense that there are people just like me who also want to do something, despite the current economic situation. That's probably the greatest reason to go to one of these networking events; for the sake of keeping yourself sane while being yourself.

FILMS & TV

FILMS & TV

A GLANCE AT POPULARITY AND REACTION


In the last number of months, and possibly years, I've noticed myself becoming more and more drawn towards television productions as a writer. The list of shows I've grown to love because of their unique delivery, intelligent plots, and witty dialogue is LITERALLY too long to write in a productive blog, however chances are you name it, I have an opinion on it. Indeed my tastes, though risking sounding boastful, are grounded in talent flocking the small screen. Writers, directors, producers, cinematographers, and actors alike have all made the committed transition to television in the wake of The Wire, The Sopranos, and Breaking Bad. There's many appeals as of late for the new wave of talent to scurry over to television.
  • More reliable work.
  • More defined schedules.
    • A season of 6-12 one hour episodes may take just as little or even less than any feature film, resulting in more bang for the buck.
  • Instant nationwide fame for the actor (for what may take an exclusively film actor years to gain).
  • "Fan-base" following
  • Weekly episodes guarantees maximum exposure.
  • More accessibly "on-demand" than recently released films.
  • More defined royalties for television performances than film/DVD sales.
  • Compatible prices.
    • Game of Thrones and The Walking Dead reportedly have a budget of $1 Million per episode, resulting in a season of 6-12 episodes costing less than most major label film.
      • Again, more bang for the buck.
  • Length for writers and directors to truly explore character, plot, themes, issues, and conflicts.
  • Apart from Water Shed regulations and a polite disclaimer at the start, there are no censors on television.
  Yet, I'm often annoyed by the slightly stale reverence people hold for the current model of films (I will cover future models soon). Being a writer in Ireland is tough enough as it is without having to deal with the fact that there is next to nothing in the way of funding, commissions, or even transparency in television broadcasting, forcing many to head for the UK (which isn't a bad thing). One glance at film and television message and job boards will reveal a deep seeded incline for films.

But why isn't that? Granted; studios' claims of loses in cinema are exaggerated and trivial, but the accessibility and quality of modern day film has declined due to a number of reasons;
  • Sales:
    • As stated, sales have taken a hit, though not necessarily as tough as you may possibly be led to believe, and not entirely because of pirate bay (trust me Michael Bay, VERY few people are seeding Transformers on Utorrent right now). This hit has led to many studios to shuffle a little and some have taken the approach of bigger is better, hence the outrageously over-ambitious films that are simply money thrown at a screen. I get slightly amused when producers are shocked a $80 Million movie couldn't break even, especially if its a third or fourth installment in a franchise.
    • The other side of this sword, however, is that for the movie to be worth making, they need more return on their investment,which in turns causes theaters to raise ticket prices.
  • Art:
    • The reaction to these super block buster films is, of course, the indie. The true indie. The film even Kick Starter couldn't help. The $5,000, shot on a few DSLR, film that has the boom operator looking like Bobby Sands towards the end because they can't afford to pay him but "can offer a credit and show reel material". In essence there's nothing wrong with this film apart from the fact it's in a medium where it'll never be seen outside of film festivals. This is because of simply two things;
      • Lack of marketable material.
      • Censors.
    • The other part of what's wrong with this is that you have films that are good pieces of art, but aren't films, despite trying to be passed off as them. They are visually and audibly pleasing and provocative, but not films. A one long clip of a sun rise is art... but it's not a film. This has definitely arisen from short film culture, as well as foreign cinephile subcultures such as the French. Outside of that, it'll never communicate well with the average person. And on one hand you can argue it's above them, but on the other, it doesn't say much for you as a film maker if your film has requirements and suggested reading in order to be enjoyed. Make in the same way critics of Avatar who didn't see the film in 3D are unjustly dismissed since they saw it outside its "intended" environment, so too can you not say the similar. Film is not circumstantial.
With the avaunt of Netflix and Amazon in the works of slowly building their catalog of original programming, television programs may very well not need to deal the foibles of network or even cable broadcasters, including government funded ones (hint, hint). We have already seen this happen with House of Cards and Orange is the New Black. One could argue Youtube has already done the same with a whole sleuth of comedians, musicians, actors, film makers, and cats who are cute.

So why? Why is there still something to movies that makes people want to be part of them. Is it the nostalgia? Films were first, and were more of a travelling side show attraction than the format they are today. And with respect to television, the high quality feature is relatively recent. And it actually is ironic that Mad Men, New Girl, and Homeland should have to share air time with Toddlers and Tiaras, Big Brother, and whatever MTV is shoveling out these days. Indeed TV is just as guilty as cinema when it comes to hits and misses. And perhaps on a grander scheme. How many hundreds of channels produce thousands of shows?How many are good? And sadly not even the good ones are guaranteed not to be cancelled.

I am entirely in favor of remodeling cinema and keeping it alive. Perhaps I'm wrong to question why would others care for this thing when they can do something bigger, longer, and more engrossing, like TV. Maybe film will be, in the future, something like an espresso shot of escapism. And maybe that's it. Maybe that's why film is still looked up to; because it's escapism. TV has never been that. TV has been informative and reactionary. It's comforting and intriguing, but not escapism. We watch Breaking Bad with friends, and our dinner, and while we're knitting. Film, is the big event. That one treat we give to ourselves, similar to how our parents gave it to us. We escape the house, the job, the neighbors,  and we sit in the dark... and escape everything. Not because it's unbearable, but because we want to bare someone else's cross for a while.

There's no doubt in my mind I still have a strange attraction towards writing for television, and I'm going through a slightly distaste for cinephile culture (especially in Ireland), but, just like Joss Wheldon moves from Vampires to Avangers, I'm not ruling anything out. And neither should you.

Monday, September 2, 2013

WRITER LIFE HACKS: BBC WRITER'S ROOM

WRITER LIFE HACK: BBC WRITER'S ROOM


I really cannot recommend the BBC's Writer's Room enough; it truly is a one stop noticeboard for aspiring writers across the world. The BBC has always prided itself on attracting the best but this section of the BBC website truly out does itself with it's resources.
  • SEND YOUR SCRIPT
    • The BBC accepts scripts. Formerly, it had an open policy towards scripts, but it has now opted for a more scheduled and structured period setting, where it will announce it's acceptance seasons. A new policy, it is unclear if there are to be multiple annual seasons, or just one. Please check regularly.
  • WRITE YOUR SCRIPT
    • Are you LITERALLY just starting to write? Or do you just like reading about the art/craft? The writer's room has a section on how to get started and how to keep at it. Everything from structure to redrafting. Something of a cheat sheet for writing.
  • BE INSPIRED
    • Interviews with established writers... what more could you want.
  • OPPORTUNITIES
    • The BBC takes it upon itself to keep you informed about the chances you have to get your work published, produced, read, or commissioned by third parties. Even if you are too late to send your script to the BBC, you can always get it accepted by someone else.
  • BBC SCRIPT LIBRARY
The BBC Writer's Room is not just a website for writing. It is a website to keep you writing until you get that faithful knock at the door.

THE RISE OF DRAMEDY

THE RISE OF "DRAMEDY".

Even as I write the word, Blogger's auto correct underlines it in red, as if to politely say "I believe you've made a mistake", while unintentionally dating itself straight away.

For those of you unfamiliar, in recent years "Dramedy", a combination of features of drama and comedy, have risen in popularity, mostly in the form of television shows and "indie" films. Most notable example of "Dramedies" include "Ugly Betty", "Desperate Housewives", "Girls", "Weeds", "Little Miss Sunshine", "New Girl", "Glee", and "Juno", as well as arguably "Scrubs", "Misfits", and "Skins".

Common features and formats included (but are definitely not limited to);
  • Between half hour and hour long 3-4 act structures.
  • Usually Prime Time/Early Post Watershed hours.
  • Featuring "Young" protagonists (young being anyway from late teens to mid-30's).
  • Set in mundane or "poetic realistic" settings (for example, living in New York in the magical time of your 20s, or the world stopping troubles of high school, etc).
  • Light-hearted approaches to formerly taboo or serious subjects (e.g. premarital sex, drugs, relationships, etc).
But why has Dramedy risen to pop culture awareness from seemingly nowhere? Here are a few reasons;
  • Mainstream Media;
    • In an attempt to please as many people as possible, TV has blurred the lines between drama and comedy, offering both in one easy to swallow show.
  • Changing Tastes;
    • With familiar formats being worn worst for wear, TV writers have become inventive to stay ahead of an audience that found laugh-track sitcoms and telenovella styled dramas redundant. How many times have you guessed what was going to happen next, only to be proven correct?
    • "Drama" seems to now apply to darker, more plot driven stories such as "House of Cards", "Lost", and "Utopia". The term drama now attracts a much more "adult" and sophisticated audience, possibly even appealing to disenchanted cinephiles.
    • "Indie" once meant a film that no one would ever see. Now it's just another film brought to you by one of the top five studios. With the rise in popularity of Indies came a taste for quirky, unique, odd-ball characters in heavy situations.
  • Changing Media and trends;
    • Comedy sketches are now left for Youtube, while cinematic experiences are enjoyed in the home. To compete, comedies had to become ongoing stories with plot rather than simply episodic.
  • Popular precursors to Dramedies;
    • "Friends".
    • "Sex and the city".
    • "Meet the parents".
    • "Firefly".
    • "Buffy the vampire slayer".
    • "The Simpsons".
    • "Different Strokes"
But now that it's here, or at least acknowledged as existing, where do we go? Is it a fad or the next step in structuralism? One school of thought is that, much in the same way "Alien" was a combination of horror and sci-fi elements, Dramedy may simply be the natural progression for televised stories. Another way of looking at it though is shows like Different Strokes and the Brady Bunch were dramedies by contemporary standards long before the shows we now watch today, which implies these things go in cycles. I doubt New Girl will go down the same route Different Strokes did with a child molesting bike shop owner.

Whatever your thought may be, Dramedies may very well be here for the meanwhile. So lets get used to it. Or not? Leave a comment about how you feel.